Sure, we have open source, federated replacements for Instagram, Tiktok, and YouTube. How do we get creators to use this stuff? One consideration involves the ability to pay for things.

I’ve been thinking a lot recently about PeerTube, Loops, Bandwagon, and other platforms in the Fediverse that are geared around artists. I might get flamed for this, and you’re welcome to disagree, but I think the network is in dire need of having support for commerce.

Not “Big Capitalism” commerce, but the ability for people to buy and sell things, support projects, and commission their favorite creators to keep making more stuff.

  • rumba@lemmy.zipEnglish
    3·
    11 hours ago

    Not OP, but I’d work real fucking hard to give us something that can be a viable alternative to Youtube where a corporate monopoly doesn’t take 95% of the cash. It doesn’t even need to be federated, but we all see the shithole Odysee immediately became. We have a substantial number of people here with like interests and marginally like feelings on a lot of topics that would make great video content.

    Peertube has been around for 7 years, and there isn’t enough content on it to occupy even a Linux nerd for more than 30 minutes a week. People are only making videos on YouTube because they can make some semblance of a living at it.

    I think giving people who are willing to create videos some decent tools for monetization in open products would be a reasonably good idea. We have nothing there now; we don’t have anything to lose by it. It’s not like great content that doesn’t exist can be walled off to us.

    This could be as easy as forking peertube and putting in patreon privitization links. Or it could be a federated version of KoFi that ties in.

    • dbtng@eviltoast.orgEnglish
      4·
      11 hours ago

      Ok, I quibble with much of what you just wrote, but your first line contained a lucid point.

      In essence, you propose that a federated monetization scheme would direct the bulk of the pie to the participants and not to the big corporate interests.

      Now that’s a damned interesting thing to consider.
      I think its obvious that it would/will go awry. Any time you get non-profits screwing around with money, somebody figures out how to steal it.
      But if even a bit more went to the participants and paid for infrastructure, that would be a positive thing.

      But again … non-profits and coops never handle money correctly. Watch this get all the way to the goalpost and then swoop, it all gets handled with GooglePay. Its doomed. DOOM.

      • rumba@lemmy.zipEnglish
        2·
        11 hours ago

        I think its obvious that it would/will go awry.

        I’m not even sure that is possible, but I’d like to see us try something.

        Maybe the best place to start is by allowing a microtransaction service into the UI and let people add their own API keys to known players.